Latest
History of the Founders Regarding Non-Christians as Office Holders PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. G. Thomas Sharp   
Monday, August 30 2010 19:20

It is intriguing that some of our Founders left some direction that has merit concerning the present Moslem/mosque affair in Manhattan at ground zero.  Consider the comments of Justice Joseph Story, Governor Samuel Johnson and Justice James Iradell.

Note: (Justice Story was a member of the U.S. Supreme Court for 34 years, and authored 286 opinions 286. He, along with Chancellor James Kent (Chief Justice of the New York State Supreme Court) is known as the Father of American Jurisprudence. Justice Story wrote the majority opinion for the famous Holy Trinity vs. The United States case in 1892.)

In Justice Joseph Story’s legal wrote in his legal commentaries, that:

The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less advance, Mahometanism [his spelling], or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christians. (Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, Vol. III, p. 728, 1871)

Justice Story’s comments highlights the fact that America’s Founders were careful not to violate the principle of religious freedom established in the First Amendment (the right of America’s citizens to the free expression of religious worship, and the forbidding of the Federal Government to establish a state sponsored religion), while at the same time maintaining that “CHRISTIANITY” was and is America’s common law that they are often vulnerable to present day progressive criticism and gross misapplication—this is especially true when in a revisionist mode non patriots plunder and manipulate the Constitution (as is the case concerning this particular circumstance).

When reading early American history—it seems at first glance that the Founders established a completely pluralistic society. But on a more careful examination you will find that this is not the case at all—at least, it was their clear intent and belief for the first 100 years of our nationhood that Christianity, not a particular sect, or denomination, with tithes, tenets and ordinances, but general Christianity—Biblical Christianity—was America’s common law.

This intent is reflected in Story’s commentary above. But here is the difficulty…even though the Founders believed that Christianity was the founding reality of the America n Republic, they did not resist or prohibit other religions from their right to worship here. Therefore, they knew that a time could come when the people of America may change and allow another religion, or that people of “NO” religion could become dominate in the culture.

Consider this. In the North Carolina ratification convention for the American Constitution—before the turn of the nineteenth century—Governor Samuel Johnson explained:

It is apprehended that Jews, Mahometans (his spelling), pagans, etc., may be elected to high office under the government of the United States. Those who are Mohometans, or any others who are not professors of Christian religion, can never be elected to the office of President or other high office, but in one of two cases. First, if the people of America lay aside the Christian religion altogether, it may happen. Should this unfortunately take place, the people will choose such men as [that] think as they do themselves. Another case is if any persons of such descriptions should, notwithstanding their religion, acquire the confidence and esteem of the people of America by their good conduct and practice of virtue, they may be chosen. (Jonathan Elliot, ed., The Debates in the Several Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Vol. IV, pp. 198-199, 1836)

Supreme Court Justice James Iredell, who was nominated to the High Court by George Washington, further explained:

But it is objected that the people of America may perhaps choose representatives who have no religion at all, and that pagans and Mahometans [his spelling] may be admitted into office…But it is never to be supposed that the people of America will trust their dearest rights to persons who have no religion at all, or a religion materially different from their own. (Ibid, p. 194)

The tragedy is that most do not understand that our Founders never believed this day would come. But it has!

Last Updated on Tuesday, August 31 2010 15:22
 
Darwin is Wrong: "Top Ten List" PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. G. Charles Jackson   


“The theory of evolution has no weaknesses.” Prof. Kenneth Miller, of Brown University, author of “Finding Darwin’s God”

www.salon.com/env/feature/2009/03/28/texas_evolution_case

 

1. Spontaneous Generation

“Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow of this simple experiment. No, there is now no circumstance known in which it can be affirmed that microscopic beings came into the world without germs, without parents similar to themselves.” Louis Pasteur, addressing the French Academy of Science in the 19th century

“…the how part has everyone stumped. Nobody knows how lifeless chemicals organized themselves into the first living cell.” Paul Davies, quoted in article “Born Lucky” in New Scientist, 7/12/03, p32

“I think we have to admit that we're looking through a glass darkly here . . .

Read more...
 
Tea Party Speech - April 15, 2010 PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. G. Thomas Sharp   
Tuesday, June 01 2010 20:08

I’ve been watching the Tea Party Movement for some time now, and have even spoken at a couple of their rallies, in an attempt to ascertain what significant strains of emphasis would ultimately surface as their guiding agenda and purpose. It seems to me that I hear a constant clamor among Tea Party attendees for a return to historical conservatism—a conservatism in kind with our 1776 counterparts—a conservatism that is freely expressed in life, duty and faith—a conservatism that will again protect life, liberty and property, and a conservatism that will connect US inseparably to our Founding Era (1760-1805). It is to this end that I write this blog.

If, today, we only seek conservative practices without our Founder’s purpose and philosophy…

Read more...
 
April 2010 Letter From The President PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, April 14 2010 00:00

Dr. Sharp

Dear Friend of the Foundation:

The United States of America is facing the most serious trial for her freedom and liberty in her 234 year history and the next few months will determine how it will be played out. The fact of the matter is that overwhelming forces have arisen that despise the Bible, its God, its instruction and its institution.

I fear that most Americans, even believing Americans, have forgotten how and why America’s founding era was from 1760 to 1805. It is true that the vision and purpose of the original Pilgrim and Puritan settlers (1620 and 1630, respectively) had been lost in the maze of prosperity and corruption by 1730. The spiritual condition of most Americans had become as deplorable as it is today.  But what most have forgotten today is that from 1740 to 1760 there was a sovereign, powerful awakening that swept over the colonies, restoring the authority of the Bible and its teaching, particularly, the total depravity of man, to, at least, 66% of the colonists.

The preaching of George Whitefield, Jonathon Edwards, Samuel Davies, etc., had stirred and revived the deadened hearts and consciences of

Read more...
 
Your Body Is Your ID PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, February 24 2010 03:23

YOUR BODY IS YOUR ID

Problems, answers and legislative solutions

Enrolling the world into a single global biometric ID system

The world is being enrolled into a single global system of identification and financial control. One’s body is now directly linked to the control of financial transactions through biometric ID, an international ID system that uses computers to automatically identify individuals based on unique physical characteristics, such as a facial image. Facial recognition and digital fingerprinting are common forms of biometrics. Almost all states and nations now use biometrics to identify their residents.

The “biometric of choice” is facial recognition.  Why? Facial recognition provides easy (and deceitful) enrollment when used with photos collected for a driver license/ID card (DL/ID card) or a passport, and can

Read more...
 


AddThis

Technogenics